Complete a broad-area audit
Use a structured accessibility and public-space checklist; exact incident locations are not accepted.
- Evidence
- broad area audit
- May support
- Context Auditor
- Public summary
- Only after review
Contribute useful knowledge
Help improve public information, broad-area context, support directories, empowerment stories or mentoring. If evidence passes review, a non-financial credential may be issued. It cannot be traded, redeemed or used to rank you for work.
How the system works
The credential is the end of a review trail, never an automatic reward for volume. Personal safety incidents are deliberately outside this system.
Use an approved contribution type with a clear public-interest purpose.
Only the evidence required for that task; sensitive material remains encrypted.
Reviewers check consent, source quality, privacy and the stated criteria.
One issuance points to the approved contribution and can later be revoked.
Select credentials for a private, purpose-bound, expiring employer share.
Contribution pathways
Submission remains disabled until production identity, consent, encryption, moderation and audit operations are active.
Use a structured accessibility and public-space checklist; exact incident locations are not accepted.
Add or correct attributable public information without submitting a personal safety incident.
Record completion through an approved programme without exposing private participant notes.
Submit a fact-checkable story only with documented subject consent and a revocation route.
Confirm a public organisation, support route, opening status, or opportunity source with the owner.
Impact Token catalog
Every definition states what evidence is required and what the credential can do. There is no balance, price, exchange, leaderboard or “earn more by reporting more” mechanic.
Recognises a verified mentoring contribution completed through an approved partner programme.
The partner must confirm completion and safeguarding requirements; private participant notes are never public evidence.
BenefitMay be displayed as evidence of mentoring experience. It never guarantees selection by an employer.
Recognises completion of a reviewed broad-area accessibility or public-space audit.
The audit must use the approved checklist, exclude exact incident reports, meet privacy thresholds, and pass human moderation.
BenefitMay support invitations to future learning or partner challenges. It is never a safety rating or employment score.
Recognises a directly verified correction to public support or opportunity information.
A reviewer must verify the public contact route, ownership, re-verification date, and publication scope before issuance.
BenefitMay be shown as evidence of responsible verification work. It does not create priority access to jobs.
Recognises an approved correction or addition backed by a reviewable public source.
A reviewer must confirm the source, licence, freshness, allowed fields, and material change. Automated ingestion alone cannot issue this credential.
BenefitMay be displayed in a consented Opportunity Passport as evidence of careful public-data work. It has no cash value and does not guarantee work.
Recognises a consented, fact-checked public-interest or empowerment story.
Editorial review, subject consent, source notes, privacy review, and a revocation route are mandatory.
BenefitMay be displayed as a storytelling credential and used to discover relevant learning pathways. It has no monetary value.
Safety reports are separate from credentials to avoid encouraging duplicate, exaggerated or harmful reporting.
A credential can evidence work someone completed; it cannot buy visibility or guarantee a job.
Journey activity, searches, saved places and private reports never enter a passport or ranking model.
Future employer access must be explicit, purpose-bound, time-limited and revocable.
NGOs, campuses, legal networks, employers and civic programmes can eventually sponsor scoped tasks, verify completion and create learning or mentoring routes. They cannot issue tokens without the same evidence and reviewer controls.